Most businesses know their sales could be better. What they don't always know is exactly where the process is breaking down. A sales audit removes the guesswork — giving you an honest, structured view of what's working, what isn't, and where the biggest opportunities for improvement lie.
A sales process audit examines every stage of your pipeline, from first contact to closed deal. It identifies the friction points, the drop-offs, the inconsistencies and the missed opportunities — and turns those findings into a clear picture of where focused attention will have the greatest commercial impact.
A sales process audit is a structured review of how a business currently manages its sales activity from first contact to closed deal. It examines pipeline structure, lead qualification, follow-up processes, conversion rates at each stage, the tools and CRM being used, and the consistency of approach across the team — identifying where the process is working well and where improvements would have the greatest impact on results.
You need this when your CRM is underutilised or poorly configured, when sales data is scattered across spreadsheets, email threads and call notes rather than captured in a single system, or when your team doesn’t use the CRM consistently enough for it to provide reliable pipeline visibility. A properly implemented CRM is the foundation of an effective, data-driven sales operation.
This service includes CRM platform selection support or audit of your existing system, configuration of your CRM to reflect your sales process, data migration or cleansing, integration with relevant tools and team training. Delivered as a fully configured CRM system with documentation and training for your team.
Most marketing companies focus on channels and tactics.
We focus on reaction.
Before selecting platforms, formats, or media spend, we define how your audience thinks, feels, and decides. We use behavioural psychology to understand what will capture attention, build trust, and motivate action — then choose the channels that best support that outcome.
Every channel we use has a clear purpose, a defined role, and a measurable objective. Nothing is done “because it’s popular” or “because it’s expected”.
The result is marketing that feels natural to engage with, works across multiple channels, and is designed to deliver meaningful, long-term results.
Want to see how this approach works in practice?
A structured review of how your business currently acquires customers — examining every stage from lead generation through to close, identifying where prospects are lost, where time is wasted and where the process can be made more consistent and commercially effective.
When conversion rates are lower than expected, when the sales cycle is longer than it should be, when there is inconsistency between how different salespeople perform, when a business is scaling and needs a repeatable process, or when growth has stalled.
Lead sources and qualification criteria, the number of stages in the sales process and their definitions, typical stage-to-stage conversion rates, average deal length, the materials and messaging used at each stage, and the skills and behaviours of the sales team.
Through a combination of interviews with salespeople and sales leadership, review of CRM data (deal progression, stage durations, won and lost records), listening to recorded calls and reviewing the sales materials currently in use.
A documented assessment of the current process with specific findings on each stage, identified bottlenecks or weaknesses, benchmarked conversion rates where data allows and a prioritised set of recommendations for improvement.
Typically two to four weeks, depending on the size of the sales team, the complexity of the sales process and the quality of existing CRM data. Businesses with poor or incomplete CRM data require more qualitative investigation.
Inconsistency. Most audits find that different salespeople are running materially different processes, making it impossible to identify what works. Standardising the process is typically the highest-leverage first recommendation.
An internal audit can identify surface-level issues. External auditors bring objectivity, benchmark data from other businesses, the ability to interview the team without political constraints and experience of identifying patterns that internal teams may normalise.
By expected impact and implementation effort. High-impact, low-effort improvements should be actioned immediately. More significant structural changes — new qualification criteria, new sales stages, new enablement tools — should be sequenced based on the audit recommendations.
By establishing baseline conversion rates, deal lengths and revenue metrics before implementation, then tracking the same metrics at 30, 60 and 90 days after the recommended changes are in place.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Choose what you're happy with.
Required for the site to function and can't be switched off.
Help us improve the website. Turn on if you agree.
Used for ads and personalisation. Turn on if you agree.