Menu
Not every design change justifies a full project. Minor amendments — a phone number update, a colour correction, a copy change, a logo swap — need to be turned around quickly, accurately and without disrupting what's already working.
Minor design amendments handle those updates efficiently. Small in scope but not in importance, each change is made with the same care as any other piece of design work — so your materials stay current and accurate without the overhead of a major project.
Minor design amendments are small, targeted changes to existing artwork — such as updating a phone number, changing a date, swapping a colour or resizing an element. These changes are made within the existing file and delivered in the same format as the original, maintaining the design integrity of the piece while bringing specific details up to date.
You need this when packaging is something your customers interact with directly and it currently doesn’t reflect the quality, values or identity of your brand, when you’re launching a new product and packaging needs to be developed as part of the launch, or when customer experience research has highlighted packaging as a friction point in the post-purchase experience. Packaging that tells your brand story turns functional delivery into a moment of brand expression.
This service includes a structural and visual packaging design process, covering briefing, concept development, dieline creation, print-ready artwork, material and finish specification and production management. Delivered as finished packaging with a complete design file set and production specification.
Most marketing companies focus on channels and tactics.
We focus on reaction.
Before selecting platforms, formats, or media spend, we define how your audience thinks, feels, and decides. We use behavioural psychology to understand what will capture attention, build trust, and motivate action — then choose the channels that best support that outcome.
Every channel we use has a clear purpose, a defined role, and a measurable objective. Nothing is done “because it’s popular” or “because it’s expected”.
The result is marketing that feels natural to engage with, works across multiple channels, and is designed to deliver meaningful, long-term results.
Want to see how this approach works in practice?
Small, defined changes to an approved or near-approved design — correcting a typo, adjusting a colour, swapping an image, resizing a text element or tweaking a layout detail — that do not require a rethink of the design direction or structure.
Minor amendments are isolated, specific changes to individual elements that do not affect the overall design structure. A significant revision involves rethinking layout, changing the creative direction, replacing major design components or restructuring the content hierarchy.
In a single, consolidated and clearly annotated list. Specify the exact page, element and the precise change required. Vague feedback (‘make it pop more’) is not actionable. Specific, technical feedback (‘increase the headline font size to 36pt’) can be actioned immediately.
Two rounds of structured amendments are standard for most design projects. Additional rounds beyond this are typically charged separately. Front-loading the review process with thorough internal sign-off before submitting amendments reduces the risk of multiple rounds.
Straightforward minor amendments can typically be returned within one to two working days. An urgent amendment on a time-sensitive project should be flagged explicitly, as standard studio workflows operate on queued scheduling.
Yes. A large number of minor amendments can collectively require as much time as a single significant revision. If the cumulative amendment list is extensive, it may be more efficient to consolidate the feedback and approach the revision as a structured redesign pass.
Errors introduced during unmanaged amendments can go unnoticed — a corrected line introduces a new typo, a resized element shifts another out of alignment. A formal proof review after any amendments are applied catches these issues before they proceed to print.
Yes. A version log recording what changed between each design iteration and who approved it protects all parties and provides a clear history of how the final artwork reached its approved state.
A single named person with the authority to present approved, internally agreed feedback. Multiple stakeholders submitting conflicting amendments independently creates confusion and delays resolution.
For simple text or data changes, yes — if the client has access to the editable files and the competence to make changes without compromising the print-ready status of the artwork. For any change affecting visual design, branding or print specifications, designer involvement is recommended.